Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 Or. 288 - Meyer v. Bradbury

Meyer v. Bradbury’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder Oregon law, both campaign contributions and expenditures are forms of expression protected by [Article I, section 8], thus making legislatively imposed limitations on individual political campaign contributions and expenditures impermissible”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[i]n [ Vannatta I ], this court held that Article I, section 8, prohibits laws restricting campaign expenditures and contributions”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “prohibit or limit contributions and expenditures, of any type or description, to influence the outcome of any election.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.