Meyer v. Bradbury’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[u]nder Oregon law, both campaign contributions and expenditures are forms of expression protected by [Article I, section 8], thus making legislatively imposed limitations on individual political campaign contributions and expenditures impermissible”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n [ Vannatta I ], this court held that Article I, section 8, prohibits laws restricting campaign expenditures and contributions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“prohibit or limit contributions and expenditures, of any type or description, to influence the outcome of any election.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.