Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 P3D 91 - STATE v. ALBA

STATE v. ALBA’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Adams v. Williams · United States v. Arvizu · Alabama v. White · 134 S. Ct. 1683 - Prado Navarette v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When reviewing a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress evidence based on a complaint of an illegal search and seizure, this Court defers to the trial court's findings of fact unless they are not supported by competent evidence and are therefore clearly erroneous. We review the trial court's legal conclusions based on those facts de novo .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.