Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 Pa. Super. 499 - Commonwealth v. Gorham

341 Pa. Super. 499 - Commonwealth v. Gorham’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 2009

14 state decisions

100198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Cohen · Commonwealth v. Millhouse · Commonwealth v. Morgan · Commonwealth v. Henderson · 317 Pa. Super. 412 - Commonwealth v. Colon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under Rule 1100(d), the Commonwealth may exclude not just the time that the defendant or his attorney is unavailable for trial, but the entire period of delay that results from such unavailability. Commonwealth v. Robinson, 498 Pa. 379, 384 , 446 A.2d 895, 898 (1982) (sixteen day delay occasioned by need to put case on backup status behind two other cases at conclusion of defense continuance excludable); Commonwealth v. Millhouse, 470 Pa. 512, 518 , 368 A.2d 1273, 1276 (1977). Thus a defendant, by his unavailability, may occasion a delay greater than the actual time of his unavailability. Commonwealth v. Colon, [ 317 Pa.Super. 412, 423 , 464 A.2d 388, 394 (1983) ]; Commonwealth v. Perry, 296 Pa.Super. 359 , [362,] 442 A.2d 808, 810 (1982).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.