Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 S.C. 203 - Mazzone v. Miles

Mazzone v. Miles’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently November 2022

23 state decisions

180200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Glasscock v. Glasscock · Bobo v. Jewell · Cherry v. Thomasson · Stevenson v. Stevenson · E.D.M. v. T.A.M.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the length of time that the child has used the present surname; (2) the effect of the change on the preservation and development of the child’s relationship with each parent; (3) the identification of the child as part of a family unit; (4) the wishes of the parents; (5) the stated reason for the proposed change; (6) the motive of the parents and the possibility that the use of a different name will cause insecurity or a lack of identity; (7) the difficulty, harassment, or embarrassment that the child may experience when the child bears a surname different from the custodial parent; (8) the preference of the child if the child is of an age and maturity to express a meaningful preference; and (9) the degree of community respect associated with the present and proposed surname.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[B]oth parents have an equal interest in the child bearing their respective surname ... While it may be a custom to name a child after the father, giving greater weight to the' father’s interest fails to consider that, where the parents have never been married, the mother has at least an equal interest in having the child bear the maternal surname. In these times of parental equality, arguing that the child of unmarried parents should bear the paternal surname based on custom is another way of arguing that it is permissible to discriminate because the discrimination has been endured for many years.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.