Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 So. 2d 1118 - State v. Jamerson

341 So. 2d 1118 - State v. Jamerson’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
June 1979
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 339 So. 2d 1194 - State v. Searle · 340 So. 2d 256 - State v. Skelton · 278 So. 2d 114 - State v. McQueen · 290 So. 2d 882 - State v. Ackal · State v. Burgy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in order to sustain the use of a presumption to prove the crime charged or an essential element thereof it is incumbent upon the prosecution to demonstrate that the presumed fact must beyond a reasonable doubt flow from the proven fact on which it is made to depend.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.