341 So. 2d 735 - Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 1992
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Harris v. New York · Dennis v. United States · United States v. Knox · Hicks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It is settled in Alabama that admissions directly relating to the facts or circumstances of the alleged crime and connecting the defendant therewith are inculpatory admissions in the nature of a confession and are subject to the same rules as direct confessions, which are prima facie involuntary and inadmissible, but that admissions as to purely collateral matters, which are not confessory of guilt in any respect, are not within the scope of the rule, and the predicate as for a confession need not be laid. McGehee v. State , 171 Ala. 19 , 55 So. 159 [(1911)]; Monk v. State , 258 Ala. 603 , 64 So.2d 588 [(1953)]; Tillison v. State , 248 Ala. 199 , 27 So.2d 43 [(1946)]; Read v. State , 195 Ala. 671 , 71 So. 96 [(1916)]; Reeves v. State , 260 Ala. 66 , 68 So.2d 14 [(1953)]; Jordan v. State , 26 Ala. App. 122 , 156 So. 642 [(1934)]."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.