Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 So. 2d 861 - State v. Joseph

341 So. 2d 861 - State v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2000
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2000

18 state decisions

601977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Matthews · 290 So. 2d 273 - State v. Fallon · 318 So. 2d 27 - State v. Batiste · State v. Kirts · State v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The argument shall be confined to evidence admitted, to the lack of evidence, to conclusions of fact that the state or defendant may draw therefrom, and to the law applicable to the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “necessary incidents of the criminal act,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “integral parts of the entire transaction culminating in the actual sale and delivery of the heroin approximately two hours later,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.