Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 So. 2d 885 - State v. Nolan

341 So. 2d 885 - State v. Nolan’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
2
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

25 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably 345 So. 2d 874 - State v. Passman (1977), 388 So. 2d 664 - State v. Baldwin (1980)

25 state decisions

1101977198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Raymond · 331 So. 2d 443 - State v. Governor · 282 So. 2d 422 - State v. Jones · 324 So. 2d 349 - State v. Johnson · 331 So. 2d 848 - State v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A juror . . . who will unquestioningly credit the testimony of law enforcement officers over that of defense witnesses is not competent to serve.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The juror is not impartial, whatever the cause of his partiality. An opinion or impression as to the guilt or innocence of the defendant shall not of itself be sufficient ground of challenge to a juror, if he declares, and the court is satisfied, that he can render an impartial verdict according to the law and the evidence;”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Counsel's proposed inquiry was intended to show that [the witness's] testimony was biased or that he had an interest in his asserted version of the facts, and under this provision [La.R.S. 15:492] the trial court should have allowed cross-examination on the subject of his potential civil liability.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.