Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 SW3D 404 - State v. Woodard

State v. Woodard’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

32 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth))

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · United States v. Mendenhall · Gerstein v. Pugh · Florida v. Bostick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When a defendant asserts a search and seizure violation under the Fourth Amendment, the defendant bears the burden of producing evidence to rebut the presumption of proper conduct by law enforcement. A defendant can satisfy this burden with evidence that the seizure occurred without a warrant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A “stop” to make an inquiry, on its own, does not show a seizure. In the absence of ... evidence [typically associated with the seizure of a person — like the display of a weapon, physical touching, or the threatening presence of several officers], otherwise offensive contact between a member of the public and police cannot, as a matter of law, amount to a seizure of that person.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The ultimate question under Article 14.01(b) is 'whether at that moment the facts and circumstances within the officer's knowledge and of which he had reasonably trustworthy information were sufficient to warrant a prudent man in believing that the arrested person had committed or was committing an offense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.