Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 341 S.W.3d 932 - In Re Wolfe

In Re Wolfe’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on In Re Jorden · State Ex Rel. Dishman v. Gary · Garcia v. Laughlin · Office Employees International Union Local 277 v. Southwestern Drug Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “pre-suit discovery 'is not an end within itself'; rather, it 'is in aid of a suit which is anticipated' and 'ancillary to the anticipated suit.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “same as if the anticipated suit or potential claims had been filed”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “strictly limit and carefully supervise pre-suit discovery to prevent abuse of the rule”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.