341 Wis. 2d 281 - State v. Rowan’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 14 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[A]n appellate court may not substitute its judgment for that of the trier of fact unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the [S]tate and the conviction, is so lacking in probative value and force that no trier of fact, acting reasonably, could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ... We give great deference to the determination of the trier of fact. We must examine the record to find facts that support upholding the jury's decision to convict.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 387 Wis. 2d 684 - State v. Spencer · 387 Wis. 2d 685 - State v. Wingo

2. “it assists the convicted individual in conforming his or her conduct to the law.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 786 - State v. Fleming · 358 Wis. 2d 212 - State v. Jeremiah J. Purtell

3. “It is also appropriate for [trial] courts to consider an end result of encouraging lawful conduct, and thus increased protection of the public, when determining what individualized ... conditions are appropriate for a particular person.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 383 Wis. 2d 786 - State v. Fleming