State v. Anagnos’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

16 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Upon arrest of a person for violation of an OWI-related statute, a law enforcement officer may request the person to provide a blood, breath, or urine sample for chemical testing. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (3)(a). At the time of the request for a sample, the officer must read to the person certain information set forth in § 343.305(4), referred to as the Informing the Accused form. If the person submits to chemical testing and the test reveals the presence of a detectable amount of a restricted controlled substance or a prohibited alcohol concentration, the person is subjected to an administrative suspension of his operating privileges. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (7)(a). The person has the right to an administrative hearing and to judicial review. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (8). The administrative hearing is limited to certain issues that are set forth by statute. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (8)(b)2. If, on the other hand, the person refuses to submit to chemical testing, he is informed of the State's intent to immediately revoke his operating privileges. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (9)(a). The person is also informed that he may request a refusal hearing in court. Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (9)(a)4.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Village of Elm Grove v. Richard K. Brefka · 351 Wis. 2d 739 - State v. Brandon H. Bentdahl

2. “First, we review the circuit court's findings of historical fact under the clearly erroneous standard.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Antonio D. Brown · 344 Wis. 2d 764 - State v. Vaughn

3. “the circuit court may entertain an argument that the arrest was unlawful because the traffic stop that preceded it was not justified by probable cause or reasonable suspicion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 386 Wis. 2d 631 - State v. Parafiniuk