State v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Martindale v. Ripp · 120 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Haseltine · 151 Wis. 2d 354 - State v. Truax · State v. Davidson · State v. Mayo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“neither the purpose nor the effect of the testimony [is] to attest to”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“allows appellate courts to review errors that were otherwise forfeited by a party's failure to object.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.