In Re Reben’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district · 8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(a) If a person desires to have that person’s name changed, the person may-petition the judge of probate in the county where the person resides. If the person is a minor, the person’s legal custodian may petition in the person’s behalf. (b) The judge, after due notice, may change the name of the person. To protect the person’s safety, the judge may limit the notice required if the person shows by a preponderance of the evidence that: (1) The person is a victim of abuse; and (2) The person is currently in reasonable fear of the person's safety. (c) The judge shall make and preserve a record of the name change. If the judge limited the notice required under subsection (b), the'judge may seal the records of the name change. (d) The fee for filing the name change petition is $40. (e) The judge may require the person seeking a name change to undergo one or more of the following background checks: a criminal history record check; a motor vehicle record check; or a credit check. The judge may require the person to pay the cost of each background check required. (f) The judge may not change the name of the person if the judge has reason to believe that the person is seeking the name change for purposes of defrauding another person or entity or for purposes otherwise contrary to the public interest,”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. In re Carol A. Boardman