Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 Ark. 45 - Flowers v. State

Flowers v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
1
states following
April 2025
most recently cited

53 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently April 2025 · most notably Grillot v. State (2003), Ross v. State (2001)

53 state decisions

410200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanford v. State · McGehee v. State · Ferrell v. State · Beshears v. State · Novak v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for a directed verdict is a challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. The test for such motions is whether the verdict is supported by substantial evidence, direct or circumstantial. Substantial evidence is evidence of sufficient certainty and precision to compel a conclusion one way or another and pass beyond mere suspicion or conjecture. On appeal, we review the evidence in the light most favorable to the appellee and consider only the evidence that supports the verdict.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) Acting alone or with one (1) or more other persons, he commits or attempts to commit. . . robbery . . . and in the course of and in furtherance of the felony, or in immediate flight therefrom, he or an accomplice causes the death of any person under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.