California Co. v. Noble Drilling Corp.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

April 5, 1965.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-04-05

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1975

2 counsel of record

Relies on In re Roosevelt Lanes, Inc. · Roosevelt Lanes, Inc. v. Brunswick Corp.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-04-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joaquin Campoy, of Deutsch, Kerrigan & Stiles, Paul A. Gaudet, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for appellant.

Sam A. LeBlanc, W. Ford Reese and Adams & Reese, New Orleans, La., for appellee.

Before WOODBURY,1 JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

To the extent that the appellant's assigned errors were properly raised and preserved, we find them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is

¶2

Affirmed.

Senior Judge of the First Circuit sitting by designation