In the Matter of Mutual Board and Packaging Corp., Bankrupt. Ex-Cello Corp. v. The Oneida National Bank and Trust Company of Central New York’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.2d 294 · 1965
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2008
5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. · Constance v. Harvey · Empire State Chair Co. v. Beldock · Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. . Dake · Empire State Chair Co. v. Beldock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““There is no inequity in the result reached under New York law. If one balances interests between a creditor who does his best to file and is prevented by the clerk from doing so, and another who does his best to search and is prevented by the clerk from finding what he is looking for, the loss may well be held to fall on the second creditor rather than the first because of the first creditor’s priority of effort.” Mutual Board & Packaging Corp. v. Oneida National Bank & Trust Co., supra at 297-98.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.