Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 F.2d 46

Docket No. 21849.

Clair Evers v. Bass Powell

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-12

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1965

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Evers v. Powell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1965-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Joe M. Ingraham, Judge.

Howard S. Hoover, Houston, Tex., Murfee & Hoover, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellant.

Walter E. Workman, Houston, Tex., Baker, Botts, Shepherd & Coates, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and BROWN and FRIENDLY,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

We have carefully considered the grounds for appeal asserted by the appellant, but we have no doubt of the correctness of the judgment of the trial court determining that the complaint in this case was barred by the Texas statute of limitations. The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the trial court, D.C., 238 F.Supp. 787.

Notes:

*

Of the Second Circuit, sitting by designation

/342/f2d/46 · .json · Public domain