Nyyssonen v. Bendix Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.2d 531 · 1965
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 1988
16 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · United States v. Crescent Amusement Co. · Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Admiral Corp. · Bresnick v. United States Vitamin Corp. · B. F. Sturtevant Co. v. Massachusetts Hair & Felt Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ordinarily we think it the better practice for the trial court to prepare its own findings with such help as it may derive from counsels' requests.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““We can say with the court below that this case presents great difficulties to judges like ourselves who have only the most elementary training in science and mathematics and little experience with modern technological developments.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a patent speaks to its art and what it says can be told in complicated cases like this only by one skilled in the art.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.