Public-domain · open source

342 F.2d 800

Docket No. 22025.

Walker v. United States

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1965.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-04-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently April 1965

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Borroto v. United States · 239 F. Supp. 106 - Spiesel v. City of New York · Jackson v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-04-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Eugene Walker, pro se.

¶2William A. Kimbrough, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Mobile, Ala., Vernol R. Jansen, Jr., U. S. Atty., for appellee.

¶3Before WOODBURY,* WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM:

¶6This is an appeal from the denial of a motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 wherein appellant contends that his indictment charging violations of 26 U.S.C.A. § 4705(a) was defective for failure to specify the person to whom unlawful sales of narcotics were made. This contention was settled adversely to appellant in Jackson v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 210, and Borroto v. United States, 5 Cir., 1964, 338 F.2d 60.

¶7Affirmed.