Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 F.2d 902 - Johnette Moncrief v. Sam A. Anderson

Johnette Moncrief v. Sam A. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis

342 F.2d 902 · 1964

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
6
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 2005 · most notably Oliver Lee Kirkland and Elizabeth Smith v. Paul H. Preston and Luke Moore (1967), United States Ex Rel. Anthony Vitiello v. Walter J. Flood, Warden of the Nassau County Jail (1967)

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 7 state decisions

15019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hyatt v. People ex rel. Corkran · Bruzaud v. Matthews · Fowler v. Ross · Lee Won Sing v. Cottone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The fugitivity question is one of fact, to be determined in the first instance by the Governor of the asylum state, or, here, by the Chief Judge of the District Court sitting in an executive capacity. Hyatt v. People of State of New York ex rel. Corkran, supra, 188 U.S. at 709-711 , 23 S.Ct. at 458-459 . That factual decision is reviewable by way of habeas corpus, Bruzaud v. Matthews, 93 U.S.App.D.C. 47 , 207 F.2d 25 (1953)”. Moncrief v. Anderson, 342 F.2d 902 (C.A.D.C.1964).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.