Burchinal v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.2d 982 · 1965
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 152
Relies on Lopez v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. Green · New York Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. v. Sawyer; And Sawyer, Secretary of Commerce, v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. Et Al. · Anderson v. Jordan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Whoever ... individually ..., in contemplation of a bankruptcy proceeding . . ., or with intent to defeat the bankruptcy law, knowingly and fraudulently transfers or conceals any of his property. . . .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.