Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 F.2d 995

Docket No. 14973.

Bencel v. Frost

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 15, 1965.

Decided March 31, 1965.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1965-03-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1965

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1965-03-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Milton Garber, Baker, Garber & Chazen, Hoboken, N. J. (Nathan Baker, Bernard Chazen, Hoboken, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.

¶2Victor C. Hansen, Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, Newark, N. J. (George P. Lacay, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.

¶3Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The opinion of Judge Meaney in the district court, completely and properly disposes of the unseaworthy and res ipsa loquitur questions raised on this appeal.

¶6The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

/342/f2d/995 · .json · Public domain