Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 F.3d 1012 - McQuillion v. Duncan

McQuillion v. Duncan’s Empirical Analysis

342 F.3d 1012 · 2003

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
1
states following
April 2022
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably McQuillion, Caswell v. Calderon (2004)

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

260200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McQuillion v. Duncan · Zimmerman v. City of Oakland · Charles McDowell Jr v. Arthur Calderon · 109 Cal. App. 4th 489 - In Re Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Warden argues that, at a minimum, McQuillion should not be released immediately without an accompanying three-year period of parole. This argument overlooks the fact that if McQuillion had been released on the date to which he was entitled, he would have been released in May 1994. The three-year parole, which he would have been required to serve if he had been released on time, has long since passed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.