Piggie v. Cotton’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.3d 660 · 2003
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Perruquet v. Briley (2004), RK Co. v. See (2010)
11 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Wolff v. McDonnell · Liteky et al United States · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill · Withrow v. Larkin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]aiver is the intentional relinquishment of a known right.”). . The elements of proof for retaliation claims under Title VII and § 1981 are”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.