Sevencan v. Herbert’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.3d 69 · 2002
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Arizona v. Fulminante · Johnson v. United States · In re Oliver · Waller v. Georgia
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“likely to be susceptible to requests from her husband's associates to inform them if she spotted the undercover officer.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Carson v. Fischer“a `substantial probability' that the officer's safety would be jeopardized by [their] presence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“it is likely that the State would have built a stronger case for the exclusion”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.