Hammer v. Karlen’s Empirical Analysis
342 F.3d 807 · 2003
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
March 2018
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Davis v. Alaska · Chambers v. Mississippi · Olden v. Kentucky · Hennon v. Cooper
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“This [ ] is a demanding standard. For a petitioner to obtain relief on this ground, the state court must not only have reached an incorrect result, but a truly ‘unreasonable’ one. Thus, if the state court’s decision is ‘at least minimally consistent with the facts and circumstances of the case,’ the federal court is powerless to grant relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.