342 F. Supp. 39 - Davis v. Wainwright’s Empirical Analysis
1971
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1991
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Gideon v. Wainwright · Simmons v. United States · Boyd v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the person was forced to choose between waiving his privilege or foregoing another substantial benefit, such as his job, property or other guaranteed right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“. . . it (is) intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.