Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 GAAPP 310 - Thomas v. the State

Thomas v. the State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts · Bullcoming v. New Mexico · Leger v. State · Wilson v. State · 288 Ga. App. 828 - Castillo v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “have consistently held that the Confrontation Clause does not require the analyst who actually completed the forensic testing used against a defendant to testify at trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is a supervisor, reviewer , or someone else with a personal, albeit limited, connection to the scientific test at issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.