Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 Mass. 773

M v. M

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 7, 1961

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1961-02-07

Relies on 13 N.J. Super. 454 - Donati v. Church · Mutter v. Mutter · Merrill v. Merrill

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1961-02-07

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently February 1983

4 state decisions

20196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Decree affirmed. The judge entered a decree nisi on the husband’s *774libel for divorce on the ground of the impotency of his wife (G. L. [Ter. Ed.] c. 208, § 1). He dismissed the wife’s petition for separate support. The wife has appealed from both decrees. The evidence is reported. The parties were married November 3, 1957. The libel for divorce was filed October 8,1959. The judge was dearly justified in finding that, unknown to the husband at the time of the marriage, the wife because of congenital physical abnormalities was incapable of copulation. See S-v. S-, 192 Mass. 194; Merrill v. Merrill, 126 Mass. 228; Mutter v. Mutter, 123 Ky. 754; Fehr v. Fehr, 92 N. J. Eq. 316; Singer v. Singer, 9 N. J. Super. 397, 400; Donati v. Church, 13 N. J. Super. 454. The condition is incurable. Reed v. Reed, 26 Tenn. App. 690, 693. Singer v. Singer, supra. The principle of condonation or ratification is not applicable. Fehr v. Fehr, supra; but see Donati v. Church, 13 N. J. Super. 454, 457.

Max Singer, (S. Boy Bemar with him,) for the libellee.Nyman H. Kolodny, (Daniel J. Connors with him,) for the libellant.
/342/mass/773 · .json · Public domain