Klingenberg v. Klingenberg’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably Bd. of County Commissioners of Garrett Cty. v. Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. (1997), Davidson v. Davidson (1998)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 414 (§ 1015 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1056 (§ 206 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Rohrbeck v. Rohrbeck · State v. Bell · Privette v. State · Brice v. State · In Re Arnold M.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"§ 8-205. Same-Award. (a) Grant of award.—(1) Subject to the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, after the court determines which property is marital property, and the value of the marital property, the court may transfer ownership of an interest in property described in paragraph (2) of this subsection, grant a monetary award, or both, as an adjustment of the equities and rights of the parties concerning marital property, whether or not alimony is awarded. (2) The court may transfer ownership of an interest in: (i) a pension, retirement, profit sharing, or deferred compensation plan, from one party to either or both parties; and (ii) subject to the consent of any lienholders, family use personnel property, from one or both parties to either or both parties. (b) Factors in determining amount and method of payment or terms of transfer.—The court shall determine the amount and the method of payment of a monetary award, or the terms of the transfer of the interest in property described in subsection (a)(2) of this section, or both, after considering each of the following factors: (1) The contributions, monetary and nonmonetary, of each party to the well-being of the family; (2) the value of all property interest of each party; (3) The economic circumstances of each party at the time the award is to be made; (4) The circumstances that contributed to the estrangement of the parties; (5) the duration of the marriage; (6) the age of each party; (7) the physical and mental ”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Conteh v. Conteh“pension, retirement, profit sharing, or deferred compensation plan”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Platt v. Comm'r
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.