Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 N.C. 312 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably State v. Gainey (2002), State v. Roache (2004)

3 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

140199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · State v. Odom · McDougall v. North Carolina · State v. Benson · State v. Young

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “but told her that if a person is arrested, he should say he was under the influence of drugs and he would get a lighter sentence. After defendant was arrested for Mrs. Purdy's murder, Ms. Smith visited defendant in jail. While in the presence of another detainee, defendant commented he had been to a mental health appointment. When the other detainee mimicked The Twilight Zone tune, defendant stated,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “While the evidentiary standard for a criminal defendant seeking a peremptory instruction may be the functional equivalent of the standard for a civil directed verdict, the two principles are distinct legal entities. In a capital sentencing proceeding, when submitting to the jury uncontradicted evidence supporting a mitigating circumstance, the appropriate device is a peremptory instruction.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In Young the defendant, age nineteen, and two companions went to the victim’s home and robbed and killed him. Defendant stabbed the victim twice, and one of his companions “finished him” by stabbing him five or six more times. The three young men then stole money and valuable coins and fled the scene.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.