Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 N.C. 580 - State v. Gregory

State v. Gregory’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

144
cited by 144 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

144 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 144 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Cummings (1997), State v. Wilkinson (1996)

144 state decisions

760199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Tumey v. State of Ohio · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · In re Oliver · Reynolds v. States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 144 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “has elected to review unpreserved issues for plain error when they involve either (1) errors in the judge's instructions to the jury, or (2) rulings on the admissibility of evidence.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Plain error includes error that is a fundamental error, something so basic, so prejudicial, so lacking in its elements that justice cannot have been done; or grave error that amounts to a denial of a fundamental right of the accused; or error that has resulted in a miscarriage of justice or in the denial to appellant of a fair trial.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “In criminal cases, an issue that was not preserved by objection noted at trial and that is not deemed preserved by rule or law without any such action nevertheless may be made the basis of an issue presented on appeal when the judicial action questioned is specifically and distinctly contended to amount to plain error.”
    11 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.