Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 NW2D 477 - Sorensen v. Nelson

Sorensen v. Nelson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
5
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2018

10 state decisions

501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Aetna Life Insurance v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. · O'Brien v. Elder · 12 Ill. App. 3d 995 - O'Toole v. Central Laborers' Pension & Welfare Funds · Hollaway v. Selvidge · 29 Colo. App. 418 - Mullenax v. National Reserve Life Insurance Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he parties’ desire to make a full, complete and final and permanent settlement of all of their property rights and interests of any and all claims of any and every kind and character which have arisen, which now exist, or might hereafter arise because of the marriage relationship of the parties or otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “shall fix and determine all rights and obligations between [the parties], both parties waive and agree to indemnify the other party from any claims or obligations which may otherwise arise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “express intention of both parties that the Agreement shall fix and determine all rights and obligations between them.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.