Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 NW2D 638 - State v. Olson

State v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
March 2010
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 2010 · most notably Johnson v. Commissioner of Public Safety (1985), Clow v. Commissioner of Public Safety (1985)

38 state decisions

3001984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Spinelli v. United States · Jones v. United States · 53 Cal. 2d 407 - People v. Ingle · Knapp v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]here are numerous signs indicating a person is under the influence of intoxicating liquor, and * * * an opinion on that condition can be reached without presence of all of the signs. * * * [E]ven a single objective indication of intoxication may be sufficient, depending upon the circumstances in each case * * [I]t is fundamental that each case must be decided on its own facts and circumstances and without regard to any formula.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “An after-the-fact scrutiny should not take the form of a de novo review. Rather, the duty of the reviewing court is simply to ensure that the officer had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed at the time of invoking the implied consent law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.