No. 679 July 30, 2025 301
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion
pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited
except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE
STATE OF OREGON
STATE OF OREGON,
Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
GABRIEL ISAAC FULLER,
aka Gabrial Isaac Fuller,
Defendant-Appellant.
Multnomah County Circuit Court
21CR37459; A183032
Melvin Oden-Orr, Judge.
Submitted June 13, 2025.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate
Section, and Shawn Wiley, Deputy Public Defender, Oregon
Public Defense Commission, filed the brief for appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived
appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, Chief Judge, and Egan, Judge.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Affirmed.
302 State v. Fuller
LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment revoking probation
and sentencing him to 36 months in prison. Appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour,
(1991). The brief does not contain
a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.1
In March 2022, defendant was convicted of one
count of strangulation constituting domestic violence and
one count of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic
violence, and the trial court sentenced him to four years of
probation. A month later, the trial court issued an order for
defendant’s arrest for allegedly violating his probation. At
the probation violation hearing in November 2023, defendant admitted that he had violated the conditions of probation by violating the curfew of his housing, failing to disclose
a new romantic relationship to his probation officer, failing
to promptly and truthfully answer his probation officer
regarding violating curfew, and having contact with the victim of his crimes of conviction. Based on those admissions,
the trial court revoked defendant’s probation and sentenced
him to 36 months in prison.
Having reviewed the record, including the trial
court file, the transcript of the hearing, and the Balfour
brief, we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.
1
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge
panel.
