Garrett v. Watson’s Empirical Analysis
1959
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1985
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 33 Cal. 2d 453 - Lockard v. City of Los Angeles · Wakefield v. Kraft · Crozier v. County Commissioners of Prince George's County · Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil Trust · Weaver v. Bishop
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Under the provisions of 19 O.S.1951 §§ 431 and 432, parties affected adversely by the application of a re-zoning resolution or order adopted under the provisions of 19 O.S.1957 Supp. § 863.1 et seq., are authorized to appeal to the District Court from the order made by the Board of County Commissioners in rezoning an item of privately owned property.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.