In re Cockley

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 22, 2000

Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 2000-09-22

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently July 2010

3 state decisions

Relies on In re Cockley

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2000-09-22

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

¶2On January 26, 1998, petitioner was suspended from the practice of law for eighteen (18) months retroactive to May 2, 1996. In the Matter of Cockley, 329 S.C. 369, 495 S.E.2d 780 (1998). Petitioner has now filed a petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness recommends that the petition be granted. We agree and hereby reinstate petitioner to the practice of law in this state.

¶3IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Jean H. Toal, C.J./s/ James E. Moore, J./s/ John H. Waller, Jr., J./s/ E.C. Burnett, III, J./s/ Costa M. Pleicones, J.