¶1is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Art. I, Sec. 20, Const. 1974. Applicant has had no hearing. See also Hart v. Coiner, 4 Cir., 483 F.2d 136.
¶2the writ should be granted.
¶3is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
342 So. 2d 225
Decided February 18, 1977
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1977-02-18
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1979
1 federal appellate ·
Relies on Hart v. Coiner
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-02-18
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1is of the opinion the writ should be granted. Art. I, Sec. 20, Const. 1974. Applicant has had no hearing. See also Hart v. Coiner, 4 Cir., 483 F.2d 136.
¶2the writ should be granted.
¶3is of the opinion the writ should be granted.