342 So. 2d 306 - Thompson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The exclusionary rule announced in Miranda applies only where custodial interrogation produces some response to the defendant and the State seeks to introduce that response into evidence at the trial of the defendant. Miranda simply does not apply %vhere there is custodial interrogation of the defendant and the responses obtained are not introduced in evidence by the State at the trial; Miranda formulated a rule designed to exclude evidence, but not to void convictions where fruitless custodial interrogation occurs in the absence of prior warnings.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Hodnett v. State

2. “[a]ny information gained from questioning before advising an accused of his Miranda warnings is inadmissible at trial.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 910 So. 2d 528 - Carpenter v. State