Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 So. 2d 505

State v. Omasta

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 3, 1977

Supreme Court of Florida · decided 1977-02-03

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1982

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-02-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ. Upon further consideration of the cause, we conclude that no direct conflict of decisions exists as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

¶2It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND and KARL, JJ., concur.BOYD, SUNDBERG and HATCHETT, JJ., dissent.
/342/so2d/505 · .json · Public domain