342 So. 2d 616 - State v. Hall’s Empirical Analysis
1977
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2009
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Chimel v. California · Weeks v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Ker v. State of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining whether reasonable cause for arrest exists, the rigorous proof required for conviction is unnecessary. Reasonable cause is something less and must be judged by the probabilities and practical considerations of everyday life on which average men, and more particularly, average police officers can be expected to act. (citations omitted) State v. Hall, 342 So.2d 616, 619 (La.1977), cert. denied 434 U.S. 846 [ 98 S.Ct. 149 , 54 L.Ed.2d 112 ] (1977). See also State v. Marks, 337 So.2d 1177 (La.1976).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.