Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 So. 2d 972 - Treiman v. Malmquist

342 So. 2d 972 - Treiman v. Malmquist’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
September 2016
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2016

14 state decisions

6019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bullock v. Carter · Lubin v. Panish · 85 So. 2d 852 - Ervin v. Collins · 129 So. 2d 419 - Bodner v. Gray · 131 So. 2d 713 - Jones v. Board of Control

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The law places restraints upon all of its citizens in the exercise of their rights and liberties under a republican form of government. Such restraints have been found to be necessary in the development of our democratic processes to preserve the very liberties which we exercise. Similar restraints may lawfully be imposed upon individual candidates for public office."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Fundamental to our system of government is the principle that the right to be a candidate for public office is a valuable one and no one should be denied this right unless the Constitution or an applicable valid law expressly declares him to be ineligible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[u]nreasonable or unnecessary restraint[ ] on the elective process.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.