Crofford v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Watkins v. Junker · Texas Co. v. State & Duval County Ranch Co. · Hamilton v. Hamilton · 55 Tex. Civ. App. 273 - Baum v. Daniels · Sibley v. Southland Life Ins. Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here the damages, either ex contractu or ex delicto, are complete at a definite time, and the amount is determinable by fixed rules of evidence and known standards of value, interest is recoverable as a matter of law from the date of accrual of the cause of action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.