Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 S.W.3d 352

State v. Rennick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2011

This page is marked noindex.

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-05-31

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-05-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Order

PER CURIAM:

¶2 Defendant Robert A. Rennick, Jr. appeals a judgment convicting him of one count of first-degree statutory rape for which he was sentenced to sixteen years in the Missouri Department of Corrections Division of Adult Institutions. In his appeal, Defendant claims the trial court erred in submitting a jury instruction referring to Defendant’s intoxication at the time of the offense and precluding defense counsel from cross-examining the victim’s mother about her plans to divorce Defendant. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error in submitting an instruction regarding intoxication and no prejudice from excluding questions regarding the victim’s mother’s intentions to divorce Defendant.

¶3 Affirmed. Rule 80.25(b).

/342/sw3d/352 · .json · Public domain