Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

342 S.W.3d 444

Blanchard v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 14, 2011

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-06-14

Decided 2011-06-14

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Antonio Blanchard appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of post-conviction relief was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties, for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2011).

1

¶3 . All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2011, unless otherwise indicated.

/342/sw3d/444 · .json · Public domain