State v. Vorhees’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Taylor · State v. Roper · State v. Vorhees · State v. Davis · State v. Newberry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Id. In the absence of evident, obvious, and clear error, we should not proceed further with our plain error review. If we find plain error, we must continue to the second step to consider whether or not a miscarriage of justice or manifest injustice will occur if the error is left uncorrected. Id. at 607-08 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Barton“[i]t is not clear at all that the prosecutor meant future victims of Appellant rather than little girls whose abuser walked out with no penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n light of the considerably more inflammatory statements Missouri courts have condoned on review for plain error,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.