York v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler))
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Terry v. Ohio · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Blockburger v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If jeopardy has not attached, then no aspect of double jeopardy, including its collateral-estoppel component, is implicated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Issue preclusion bars successive litigation of "an issue of fact or law" that is "actually litigated and determined by a valid and final judgment, and ... is essential to the judgment." If a judgment does not depend on a given determination, relitigation of that determination is not precluded.... A determination ranks as necessary or essential only when the final outcome hinges on it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Waters“[i]n at least one instance — the voluntariness of consent— the burden of proof is ‘clear and convincing evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.