Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 U.S. 225 - United States v. Smith

United States v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1952

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
16
cited 16 times by the Supreme Court
May 2021
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (16 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2021 · most notably United States v. Healy (1964), Bridges v. United States (1953)

24 federal appellate · 2 district ·

42019521960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Gottfried · United States v. Obermeier

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he WSLA has three components: (1) a triggering clause (“When the United States is at war the running of [the applicable statute of limitations] shall be suspended.”), (2) a suspension period (“three years”), and (3) a termination clause (“suspended until ... after the termination of hostilities as proclaimed by the President or by a concurrent resolution of Congress.”).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““When the United States is at war the running of any statute of limitations applicable to any offense (1) involving fraud or attempted fraud against the United States * * * shall be suspended until three years after the termination of hostilities as proclaimed by the President or by a concurrent resolution of Congress.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “any offense against the laws of the United States.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.