Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 342 U.S. 25 - McMahon v. United States

McMahon v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

899
cited by 899 later decisions
30
cited 30 times by the Supreme Court
6
states following
July 2024
most recently cited

380 federal appellate · 81 district · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 899 later decisions (30 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Nordic Village, Inc. (1992), Office of Personnel Management v. Richmond (1990)

380 federal appellate · 81 district · 17 state decisions

295019511960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMcMahon v. United States (from Third Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Sherwood · United States v. Shaw · United States v. Michel · Thurston v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 899 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “construed strictly in favor of the sovereign.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Since no time is fixed within which the seaman is obliged to present his claim, under petitioner's position he would have it in his power, by delaying its filing, to postpone indefinitely commencement of the running of the statute of limitations and thus to delay indefinitely knowledge by the Government that a claim existed. We cannot construe the Act as giving claimants an option as to when they will choose to start the period of limitation of an action against the United States.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In view of that state of the record making it uncertain whether the point would have any effect on the outcome and the fact that petitioner has not raised the point, we find it inappropriate to consider whether the statute of limitations is tolled for a maximum of sixty days while a claim is pending and not disallowed either by notice or by operation of the regulations.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.